Franklin County, VT
Property Data

Franklin County, Vermont: Dairy Country Meets Border Economy

There's a paradox running through Franklin County's housing market that takes a moment to unpack. Here is a largely rural Vermont county — home to St. Albans, sprawling dairy farms, and one of the busiest land border crossings into Canada at Highgate Springs — posting 11.1% year-over-year home price growth while maintaining median values that remain comfortably below the national average. In a state where Chittenden County has become increasingly unaffordable, Franklin County is quietly becoming one of the most watched migration destinations in northern Vermont.

Key Statistics

The Burlington Spillover Effect

The story behind those price gains is largely geographic. Franklin County sits directly north of Chittenden County, home to Burlington and the University of Vermont. As Burlington's median home values pushed well past $400,000 and inventory dried up, buyers priced out of the city began looking up Route 89. Franklin County offered something increasingly rare in Vermont: genuine affordability, high homeownership rates, and enough broadband infrastructure (88.5% access) to support remote work. That 12.4% work-from-home rate tells you this migration story is real and ongoing — remote workers don't need Burlington's commute radius anymore, they just need fiber.

The price spread within the county is also worth noting. The gap between the 10th percentile ($99,960) and 90th percentile ($525,000) is enormous — suggesting a market with both distressed rural inventory and increasingly competitive near-suburban properties around St. Albans City and St. Albans Town.

The Renter Squeeze

For all its homeownership strength — 78% is exceptional for any county — Franklin County has a serious problem hiding in plain sight. Nearly 45% of renters are cost-burdened, spending more than 30% of income on housing, and over 22% face severe rent burden. With a median rent of $1,164 and the county's median income sitting just above the national average, the math is simply not working for the roughly 22% of households who rent. This is a classic secondary-market affordability trap: as ownership demand rises and prices follow, rental supply tightens and landlords capture the gains.

A Workforce Portrait Worth Examining

The educational attainment profile — only 18.7% with a bachelor's degree, 37.2% with high school as their highest credential — reflects Franklin County's identity as working agricultural and manufacturing territory. The county's dairy economy remains significant, and Saint-Gobain's manufacturing presence in St. Albans provides stable blue-collar employment. The 2.8% unemployment rate is impressively low and consistent with Vermont's tight labor market statewide. Yet the 17% limited English speaking population — one of the highest figures in rural Vermont — points to an active agricultural labor force with its own distinct housing and economic needs.

FAQs

What makes Franklin County, Vermont unique? Franklin County is one of the few rural Vermont counties experiencing genuine housing demand pressure driven by Burlington overflow migration and remote work adoption — all while maintaining median prices below the national average. Its position as a working dairy and manufacturing county with a significant cross-border economy near Quebec gives it an economic identity distinct from Vermont's more tourist-driven regions.

Is Franklin County, Vermont affordable to buy a home? By Vermont standards, yes — median prices around $305,000 remain below Chittenden and Washington counties. But with 11% annual appreciation and inventory constraints, the affordability window is narrowing fast. The price-to-income ratio sits near 3.9x, still reasonable, but rising quickly.

Why is rent burden so high in Franklin County if home prices seem moderate? Rental inventory in the county is limited — only 22% of households rent — which concentrates demand on a thin supply of units. When that supply doesn't grow with demand, even moderately priced rentals consume an outsized share of lower-income household budgets.