Explore accurate parcel and ownership records,
directly sourced from county assessors.
Washington State presents one of the more paradoxical housing stories in the American West. The same state that gave the world Amazon, Microsoft, and Boeing — and whose Puget Sound corridor routinely ranks among the priciest real estate markets in the nation — posts a median home value of $364,700, barely 14% above the national median. That figure demands immediate context: it reflects the full breadth of Washington's geography, from the high-cost Seattle metro to the agricultural flatlands of the Yakima Valley and the sparse communities of the Columbia Basin. The headline number is, in a very real sense, an average of two very different Washingtons.
| Stat | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Median Home Value | $364,700 | 14% above national median of $320,000 |
| Rent Burden Rate | 43.5% | Well above the 30% threshold for housing stress |
| Vacancy Rate | 17.5% | Notably high, suggesting significant rural inventory |
| Homeownership Rate | 71.9% | Above typical urban-state averages |
The most urgent story in Washington's data isn't home prices — it's what's happening to renters. With a median rent of $1,099 and a rent burden rate of 43.5%, nearly half of Washington renters are spending more than the standard affordability threshold on housing costs. More troubling: 21.8% face severe rent burden, meaning they're putting more than half their income toward rent. Against a median household income of $70,257 — slightly below the national median of $75,149 — that squeeze is real and deepening for the state's 28% renter population.
The median year built of 1985 tells a quiet story about Washington's development patterns. Much of the state's housing stock was built during post-war suburban expansion and the Boeing-fueled growth of the 1970s and '80s. Single-family homes dominate at 71.3% of the stock, with condos representing just 4% — a figure that feels low for a state containing one of America's most expensive mid-rise condo markets in Seattle's Capitol Hill and Belltown neighborhoods. This data almost certainly reflects a rural and small-city weighting that dilutes the urban condo density visible on any Seattle street.
The 17.5% vacancy rate is the number that raises eyebrows. Nationally, vacancy hovers closer to 10-12%. A figure this elevated suggests Washington carries significant rural housing inventory — properties in shrinking eastern communities, seasonal recreational cabins in the Cascades and Olympics, or agricultural worker housing that sits idle between seasons.
At a median age of 42.9 with 23.2% of residents over 65, Washington skews older than its tech-boom reputation implies. This is largely a rural-state phenomenon: while Seattle and Bellevue attract young professionals, towns like Wenatchee, Walla Walla, and Longview trend considerably older. The transportation picture reinforces the non-urban character: 70.2% drive alone to work, just 1.4% use public transit, and only 4.2% walk — a stark contrast to the transit-forward identity Seattle actively cultivates.
Work-from-home adoption at 11.8% is notable, likely reflecting the spillover of Seattle's tech workforce choosing to live in more affordable outlying communities while maintaining remote positions.
What makes Washington State's housing market unique? Washington sits at an unusual intersection: a globally significant tech economy concentrated in a narrow coastal corridor, overlaid on a vast rural interior with aging demographics, agricultural employment, and declining small-town populations. That tension produces housing data that looks simultaneously expensive and surprisingly affordable depending on which Washington you're measuring.
Why is Washington's rent burden so high if home prices seem moderate? Rent burden reflects income relative to rent, not home prices. Washington's median household income sits below the national average, while rents — driven upward by Puget Sound metro demand — have risen faster than wages in many communities. The result is a renter class under significant financial stress, even in markets that wouldn't be classified as "expensive" by coastal standards.
Is Washington a good state for first-time homebuyers? The 71.9% homeownership rate suggests Washington has historically been accessible to buyers, and the high rate of single-family homes means inventory exists. However, the gap between the P10 price floor of $136,668 and the P90 ceiling of $782,269 signals that affordability is almost entirely a question of where in Washington you're looking. Eastern Washington and smaller cities remain genuinely accessible; the greater Seattle metro is a different calculus entirely.
Showing 12 of 39 counties
Get instant access to comprehensive county assessors-based property data with your free API key
Need Bulk Data?
Email us at hello@realie.ai